This is Your Health on Wood Burning

With Thanksgiving and the holiday season fast approaching, perhaps your thoughts are turning to time spent relaxing in front of the fireplace. While this family pastime might seem cozy and nostalgic, you should think twice before tossing a log on the fire as the temperature drops this winter.


A group of doctors, public health researchers and environmental advocates at Allegheny General Hospital learned yesterday about the serious health effects of wood smoke and what clinicians can do to help mitigate these risks for their patients. Speaker Michael Brauer, a professor at the School of Population and Public Health at the University of British Columbia, addressed these medical professionals at the hospital’s Grand Rounds–regular presentations held for physicians on advances and innovations in healthcare and research.


As Brauer told the audience, wood smoke contains a number of dangerous components that can find their way deep into the lungs and enter the bloodstream, wreaking havoc throughout the body through our inflammatory pathways. These include fine particulate matter, carbon monoxide, nitrogen oxides and known carcinogens such as formaldehyde and benzene–not surprisingly, many of these same chemicals are also found in cigarette smoke.


More people in Pennsylvania and nationwide are turning to wood to generate heat and power as fossil fuels become more costly, making it one of the few increasing sources of air pollution in the United States, Brauer noted. Some public policy even promotes residential wood burning, touting it as a “renewable,” nearly carbon-neutral fuel that could help the country to achieve energy independence. But most of the discussions about the potential benefits of wood burning happen on economic terms and ignore the health and environmental impacts of this practice, according to Brauer.


Wood burning isn’t regulated well–if at all–by many local and state governments. And increases in wood smoke pollution naturally correspond to the winter heating season, when cold, stagnant air conditions keep the wood smoke close to the ground where it can readily contaminate homes, schools, hospitals and other buildings. Downwind areas and river valleys with poor air circulation–like in Pittsburgh–can be particularly impacted by high levels of wood smoke.


In Allegheny County, residential fuel combustion–which is 99 percent wood smoke– accounts for 20 percent of our fine particle pollution load, according to the 2012 Pittsburgh Regional Environmental Threats Analysis (PRETA): Particulate Matter report from the University of Pittsburgh’s Center for Healthy Environments and Communities. There’s also concern about the growing use of larger-scale wood-burning units–called industrial, commercial, and institutional boilers (ICIs)–which are used to heat everything from sawmills to schools.


A single source of burning wood can have an impact on at least a three-kilometer region, according to Brauer, and the potential health impacts are wide-ranging and significant. A quarter century of research has found conclusive evidence that residential wood smoke is hazardous to human heath, with effects ranging from acute respiratory distress in children to cancer in adults.


“There’s a generally consistent relationship between exposure to wood smoke and increased respiratory symptoms, increased risk of respiratory illness, including hospital admissions and ER visits, and decreased lung function,” Brauer said. “Several studies suggest that asthmatics are particularly vulnerable.”


A growing body of research also draws a link between wood smoke and cardiovascular disease, adverse birth outcomes and otitis media–a middle ear infection that represents a tremendous health and financial burden, as it is a primary reason that children visit their doctors in the first years of life.


The good news is that “we have interventions and when we implement them they are effective,” Brauer told the physicians.


Doctors should ask patients about their exposure to wood smoke and consider it a risk factor, especially for children, the elderly, pregnant women, people with preexisting illness and those with recurring respiratory infections, according to Brauer. Physicians and other medical professionals can also recommend the use of HEPA air filters in the home to patients who are exposed to wood smoke, as well as advocate for population-level solutions like exchange programs for more efficient wood-burning technologies, replacement with other fuel sources and stricter emissions controls for wood smoke.


“I like the aesthetics of a fireplace as much as the next person,” Brauer said. “But in urban areas, especially, it’s really hard to argue that it is worth it–that I should get the aesthetic benefit of my fire and the person with COPD or asthma next door should have to suffer.”


For more information on the health and environmental impacts of wood smoke in Pennsylvania, visit



Comments (4)

  1. Bill Lewin says:

    I live in BC Canada Dr Brauer states \" \"I like the aesthetics of a fireplace as much as the next person,” Brauer said. “But in urban areas, especially, it’s really hard to argue that it is worth it–that I should get the aesthetic benefit of my fire and the person with COPD or asthma next door should have to suffer.” My neighbors have a EPA approved wood stove that daily, hr after hr smokes us out,there is no protection in BC against burners I am hoping Dr Brauer would reevaluate his assessment on changing out wood stoves for more wood stoves. Their are many suffering from the effects of smoke from these so called clean burning stoves,they still spew out magnitudes more toxins then cleaner forms of heat

  2. Julie Burgo says:

    I’d like to thank Breathe Project for all they are doing to educate Pittsburgh and PA about the negative health effects of wood burning. Education for physicians is key and such a great idea. I shared the recent wood burning webinar with a group of people from all over the world who are being made sick from residential wood burning emissions. Many of these people have neighbors that have an EPA certified wood stove and these units are still dirty and become increasingly polluting as they deteriorate. Michael Brauer’s slides showed that these “New stoves are still relatively high emitters.” I am hoping that with this, there will be a new standard which calls for moving away from all solid fuels including EPA wood stoves especially in residential areas where homes are close together. It’s time to go beyond stove exchanges. I don’t think a physician would tell a mother of young children, who needs to quit smoking, to switch to a light brand of cigarettes. So I hope they don’t offer the same advice for wood burning. These EPA stoves are a failure and they aren’t a better alternative. It’s the second hand smoke that we need to be concerned with. We shouldn’t have to tape up our windows and buy air purifiers so our neighbors can have a fire. Pittsburgh’s air is bad enough without point source residential wood burning pollution adding to the mix.

    Bill Lewin, is a friend of mine. His wife has COPD and his wood burning neighbor is aware of this. Bill’s neighbor creates excessive smoke when Bill asks him to curtail his burning. This brutal attitude among some burners is not uncommon. We can’t count on our neighbors to be neighborly so we ask for a stronger stand on this please.

    Thank you again for all you are doing.

    Julie Burgo

  3. cleanairjohn says:

    NYS Government does not protect Family\’s and their right to clean air !
    check out the PBS Insight Program

  4. Catherine Doherty says:

    I also agree with Julie and Bill,I had several upwind neighbors that nearly killed me over a 16 day period with their wood smoke I have asthma and chronic bronchitis.When I sent them educationally informative letters regarding the health effects of wood smoke and it’s effect on them and me,their response was to light fires more frequently,to organize a coup against me and to send me threatening anonymous letters.
    From my own research, on forums and in my own town the majority of burners are extremely hostile.They do not care about anyone but themselves.Please do not offer the New EPA Stoves as a panacea for this deadly pollution.We have more and more new EPA stoves every winter,because people do not understand the science they operate well above 50% opacity all day.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Security Code:

Wasting water is like sending energy down the drain. That’s because water utilities use a tremendous amount of energy to treat and deliver water. Then after the water reaches your home or workplace, more energy is consumed to heat, cool …
You’d be hard pressed to find someone in the Pittsburgh area who doesn’t either have asthma or have a friend or loved one struggling with asthma.   What’s the connection between our region’s poor air quality and asthma–and what challenges …
  Whether you hit the trails or the roads, bike riding in Pittsburgh is a fabulous way to see the sights, commute and get a little exercise–not to mention, it’s a zero-emissions form of transportation.   When you ride, you …
This month’s Air Quality Community Forum–hosted by Residents for a Clean & Healthy (REACH) Mon Valley–will feature guest speakers Karen Hacker, director of the Allegheny County Health Department and Jim Thompson, ACHD deputy director of environmental health.   The meeting will …

The Heinz EndowmentsLEARN MORE >
© Breathe 2012. All rights reserved. Terms of Service | Privacy PolicySite by Citizen